String.format could work; I would prefer to have an inline syntax for the
string formatting rather than appending it at the end, but that's the major
objection. The main goal was to have the strings be easy to write and to
make it easy to have variations. I'm also trying to avoid eval-ing a stri
Can you elaborate on what makes String.format not a good fit here?
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, James Reeves wrote:
> Do you know about closures? So something like:
>
> (defn foo [arg1 arg2]
> (fn [state] (do-something-with state arg1 arg2)))
>
> - James
>
> On 25 November 2014 at 18:55, Isaa
Do you know about closures? So something like:
(defn foo [arg1 arg2]
(fn [state] (do-something-with state arg1 arg2)))
- James
On 25 November 2014 at 18:55, Isaac Karth wrote:
> I'm trying to build a string output system with functions that later have
> a state passed to it, so that I can wr
I'm trying to build a string output system with functions that later have a
state passed to it, so that I can write something like (output "The result
of this example is: " (get :result)) and have it passed to a parsing
function that takes a state and calls the functions in the list, something
