On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Drew Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may be missing some philosophical significance of the name
> function, but is there any reason why it can't work on Strings as
> well as Named-s?
Hi,
I think the philosophical point is that a String doesn't have a name,
I may be missing some philosophical significance of the name
function, but is there any reason why it can't work on Strings as
well as Named-s?
user=> (name :foo)
"foo"
user=> (name "foo")
"foo"
This would clean up conditionals I have scattered about where I
normalize heterogeneous collections of
