Dude...that's awesome. I don't know how I completely missed that. I
must have gotten lazy by the time I got to the end of the API page.
On Mar 18, 8:12 pm, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nick wrote:
> > I'm looking to do some operations upon the data in an associative
> >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nick wrote:
> I'm looking to do some operations upon the data in an associative
> structure. What do you think about this method of hijacking the
> definition of assoc-in? Is there some better way to do what I'm doing
> here?
>
> user> (defn op-in [op m [k & ks]
I'm looking to do some operations upon the data in an associative
structure. What do you think about this method of hijacking the
definition of assoc-in? Is there some better way to do what I'm doing
here?
user> (defn op-in [op m [k & ks] v]
(if ks
(assoc m k (op-in o
