Hi Dmitriy,
There's also an alternative zipper implementation called *fast-zip* [1]
which seems to be 5 times faster than *clojure.zip*. Although if
*clojure.walk* is faster in an order of magnitude or more than *clojure.zip*,
then *fast-zip* won't be much of an improvement.
Cheers,
Juan
[1]
Thanks! clojure.zip is convinient but slow, I used clojure.walk and it
turned to be several times faster in my case.
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 10:48:18 PM UTC+2, Jony Hudson wrote:
>
> If I understand right, I think you might be able to use the existing
> replace functions in clojure.walk.
If I understand right, I think you might be able to use the existing
replace functions in clojure.walk. I find that this is about twice as fast:
(time
(dotimes
[_ 10]
(walk/postwalk-replace
{"exp_1" 100 "exp_2" 20 "exp_3" 5}
[:DIV [:ADD [:ID "P1" "exp_1"] [:ID "P2" "exp_2"] "
Hi, guys!
I have an issue with my function where I use zippers to modify data
structure. The function modifies a tree (parsed grammar tree) to replace
expressions with values from a given map. Sadly, the algorithm I came up
with is pretty slow. I would appreciate if anyone can give me a hint on
