Hi,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 11:01 am, Miron Brezuleanu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I find that I tend to name struct instances like the struct. For instance,
>>
>
> You could name the struct base or something. I vaguely
> remember reading somewhere tha
On Sep 24, 11:01 am, Miron Brezuleanu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I find that I tend to name struct instances like the struct. For instance,
>
> (defstruct person :name)
>
> and then
>
> (let [person (struct person "John")]
> )
>
> which breaks further use of (struct person ...) in that let.
>
> Is t
> Is there an established naming convention that I could use? (I'm
> trying to use (let [aperson (struct person "John")]...) but I'm not
> completely happy with it.)
AppleScript uses "the-person", but I don't recommend that :)
I'd go for one of two avenues — descriptive:
(let [recipient (str
Hello,
I find that I tend to name struct instances like the struct. For instance,
(defstruct person :name)
and then
(let [person (struct person "John")]
)
which breaks further use of (struct person ...) in that let.
Is there an established naming convention that I could use? (I'm
trying
