I'm not convinced this is even a good idea (but Rich is the ultimate
judge). None of the -in fns repeat paths like that so this makes assoc and
assoc-in similar but makes assoc-in / update-in etc inconsistent.
On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-5, Łukasz Kożuchowski wrote:
>
> On 08/
On 08/18/2016 09:46 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
Anyone who has created a free JIRA account can vote on Clojure tickets.
Wow. That's nice. Just voted. Thanks for the info. I thought it's only
for contributors.
I'm not really complaining, just wanted to know what's going on and
possibly bump th
Anyone who has created a free JIRA account can vote on Clojure tickets.
High-voted tickets get Alex Miller's attention so he can try to make
progress on them, with some level of priority over tickets without votes.
Note that in some cases, 'making progress' can simply mean 'declined
sooner, rather
Just this week I have wished for an extended version of `assoc-in`
more than once. The reason is convenience, e.g. in the context of a
ring middleware:
(assoc-in response
[:headers "Location"] "/homepage"
[:session :user-id] user-id)
Extending `assoc-in` would also achieve parity with `asso
When I see mailing list posts like this I like to play the devil's advocate
a bit (at least in my own mind) and try to find problems with including a
given patch in Clojure.
A few things to consider:
1) There are really three answers to patches: "yes", "no" and "not now".
That is to say, because a
Thanks for the tip. I imagine the patch author is much more sad (it's been
one year...).
Łukasz Kożuchowski
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members
Of course you can copy the newer definition of assoc-in into your own projects
and use it if you like, but that probably doesn't prevent your little bit of
sadness.
Andy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 5:27 AM, Łukasz Kożuchowski
> wrote:
>
> I am a little sad now. Thanks for expl
I am a little sad now. Thanks for explaining!
Łukasz Kożuchowski
On Aug 13, 2016 4:56 PM, "Andy Fingerhut" wrote:
> That ticket is in a state called "Triaged", which means that a screener
> (most likely Alex Miller) thinks the issue is good enough for Rich Hickey
> to take a look at it some tim
That ticket is in a state called "Triaged", which means that a screener
(most likely Alex Miller) thinks the issue is good enough for Rich Hickey
to take a look at it some time. Rich probably hasn't looked at it yet,
because if he had, it would have likely been changed to Declined or Vetted.
As f
Hello,
Currently assoc-in does not support multiple key-value pairs the way
assoc does.
user=> (assoc {} :a 1 :b 2)
{:b 2, :a 1}
user=> (assoc-in {} [:a :b] 1 [:c :d] 2)
ArityException Wrong number of args (5) passed to: core$assoc-in
clojure.lang.AFn.throwArity (AFn.java:437)
It appears a
10 matches
Mail list logo
