> get-in is probably what you are looking for.
and
> No. It does not ignore the extra parameter! This is a default value,
> which is returned in case the index is not contained in the vector.
Ah, cool. I was going to blame the cold medicine I was on at the time
for my inability to find this inf
Hello,
Am 19.10.2008 um 00:12 schrieb kwatford:
I don't think adding this should conflict with any existing code,
though I did notice that "get" currently accepts and apparently
ignores one extra parameter.
No. It does not ignore the extra parameter! This is a default value,
which is returned
On Oct 19, 3:12 am, kwatford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find anything on
> it.
> If I have: (def A [ [ 1 2 3 ] [ 4 5 6 ] ] )
> then if I want to access a specific element, I have to do:
> ((A 1) 1) -or- (get (get A 1) 1)
get-in is probabl
Sorry if this has been asked before, but I couldn't find anything on
it.
If I have: (def A [ [ 1 2 3 ] [ 4 5 6 ] ] )
then if I want to access a specific element, I have to do:
((A 1) 1) -or- (get (get A 1) 1)
I could make a macro for this of course, but I'd kind of like to
change the call seman
