On Mar 4, 10:46 am, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2009, at 15:09, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > Supporting with-meta for fns requires they be copyable with
> > new metadata (as are all the persistent collections and symbols). I
> > haven't decided how best to support that copyability for fns that
On Mar 4, 2009, at 15:09, Rich Hickey wrote:
> Supporting with-meta for fns requires they be copyable with
> new metadata (as are all the persistent collections and symbols). I
> haven't decided how best to support that copyability for fns that are
> closures while minimizing the overhead for fns
On Mar 4, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> is there a reason why metadata is explicitly disabled on function
> objects?
>
> I find myself wanting to put metadata on functions frequently. It
> seems even more important for functions than for anything
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> is there a reason why metadata is explicitly disabled on function
> objects?
>
> I find myself wanting to put metadata on functions frequently. It
> seems even more important for functions than for any
Rich,
is there a reason why metadata is explicitly disabled on function
objects?
I find myself wanting to put metadata on functions frequently. It
seems even more important for functions than for anything else, given
that there is no way to inspect a function object at all, it
