2010/1/15 Rayne :
> Ignore this. ;)
>
> deftype and reify and all of that good stuff are now in the Clojure
> master branch. Rich pulled new into master a few days ago.
Ah, good to know :)
The last time I checked it was not yet in master.
--
Michael Wood
--
You received this message because y
Ignore this. ;)
deftype and reify and all of that good stuff are now in the Clojure
master branch. Rich pulled new into master a few days ago.
On Jan 15, 4:09 am, Michael Wood wrote:
> 2010/1/15 Simon Brooke :
>
>
>
> > OK, I'm trying to get seriously stuck in, and the first thing I'm
> > trying
2010/1/15 Simon Brooke :
> OK, I'm trying to get seriously stuck in, and the first thing I'm
> trying to do is reimplement an inference engine I first wrote in
> Portable Standard Lisp and then in InterLisp-D in /idiomatic/ Clojure.
> So please have patience with me...
>
> If one has something whic
but the reader spits an illegal argument exception. Is there different
syntax which the reader could parse? Or am I using the wrong kind of
thing?
Wrong kind of thing. defstruct defines a struct-map, which is simply a
map with some guaranteed keys. It doesn't make any assertions about
the va
OK, I'm trying to get seriously stuck in, and the first thing I'm
trying to do is reimplement an inference engine I first wrote in
Portable Standard Lisp and then in InterLisp-D in /idiomatic/ Clojure.
So please have patience with me...
If one has something which is strongly typed, is it idiomatic
