On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Bradbev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought up an interesting issue the other night. If you map a
> function over a seq of refs, then change the refs & look at the map
> return value (which will convert it from lazy to ...? Hmm, what's the
> word - motivate
On Nov 14, 5:48 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Bradbev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (which will convert it from lazy to ...? Hmm, what's the
> > word - motivated?)
>
> I think the word you want is "eager"
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/i_get_more_done_w
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Bradbev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (which will convert it from lazy to ...? Hmm, what's the
> word - motivated?)
I think the word you want is "eager"
http://www.zazzle.com/i_get_more_done_when_im_lazy_clojure_shirt-235544064302391169
--Chouser
--~--~--
I thought up an interesting issue the other night. If you map a
function over a seq of refs, then change the refs & look at the map
return value (which will convert it from lazy to ...? Hmm, what's the
word - motivated?) then you will get the current value of the refs.
The example code is
(def
