I suppose I could, but that would make some things such as using letfn
for my rules impossible when the rules are mutually recursive.
In any case, it doesn't change the fact that, though functions now
have metadata, there is no way to give functions defined letfn that
metadata. This would be usefu
It doesn't sound like your metadata is metadata any more.
Should you be proxying AFn instead?
On May 24, 3:24 pm, joshua-choi wrote:
> I have a language request for the fn special form.
>
> Functions can now have metadata. This is great, and very useful for
> me.
>
> I'd like to request that now
I have a language request for the fn special form.
Functions can now have metadata. This is great, and very useful for
me.
I'd like to request that now the (fn name …) form pass on any metadata
on the name symbol to the function itself:
user=> (meta (fn ^{:a 3} name …))
{:a 3}
This would ideall
