Hi,
Am Montag, 16. Mai 2011 09:47:30 UTC+2 schrieb Ken Wesson:
> And am I the only one bothered by the "syntaxy" behavior of the ns
> related functions and sparse and unclear documentation thereof?
>
No. There were actions started to revise and improve these things. But
obviously the personal li
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Alan wrote:
> The :rename option is not supported in that context.
It didn't say it was unsupported in that context; it said it was
unsupported period. That is misleading.
And am I the only one bothered by the "syntaxy" behavior of the ns
related functions and sp
The :rename option is not supported in that context. The :reload
option is unsupported in that context. I mention this to make it clear
that some options are supported, and :rename is not one of them. The
fact that :rename is supported in another context does not make it a
bug for this message to s
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Alan wrote:
> On May 15, 7:26 pm, Ken Wesson wrote:
>> Instance one is right near the end of section 2.9.1:
>>
>> "This is because report-ns exists in the joy.ch1 namespace and ..."
>>
>> The correct namespace name is joy.ch2.
>>
>> Instance two is in 2.9.4:
>>
>
On May 15, 7:26 pm, Ken Wesson wrote:
> Instance one is right near the end of section 2.9.1:
>
> "This is because report-ns exists in the joy.ch1 namespace and ..."
>
> The correct namespace name is joy.ch2.
>
> Instance two is in 2.9.4:
>
> "It should be noted that :rename also works with the :us
Instance one is right near the end of section 2.9.1:
"This is because report-ns exists in the joy.ch1 namespace and ..."
The correct namespace name is joy.ch2.
Instance two is in 2.9.4:
"It should be noted that :rename also works with the :use directive."
This doesn't seem to be true, at least
