Looking at the this line closely from "Advanced Compilation and
Externs" [1]:
"Closure Compiler compilation never changes string literals in your
code, no matter what compilation level you use...
Whenever possible, use dot-syntax property names rather than quoted
strings. Use quoted string property
> Well, Showdown is not really a namespace right? It's an object in the
> global environment. You should be able to grab it via js/Showdown and do
> all kinds of interopey things to it.
Right, I totally agree. Where the problem occurs though in this
particular scenario is when :optimizations is
Well, Showdown is not really a namespace right? It's an object in the
global environment. You should be able to grab it via js/Showdown and do
all kinds of interopey things to it.
On Aug 5, 2011 4:27 PM, "Alen Ribic" wrote:
> Thanks Fogus for clearing that up.
>
> Would a call to a constructor
Thanks Fogus for clearing that up.
Would a call to a constructor function in a namespace of a third-party
library be an exception for the time being? (I can't seem to see a
clear way you can express that via `js` namespace.)
Example:
> new Showdown.converter().makeHtml(~{b-txt},~{safe})
Showdown
To access global JavaScript interop thingies (a technical term) you
should use the `js` namespace. The use of `js*` should be considered
a bad idea. It's used in core, but only for very low-level
operations. It should be considered undocumented and therefore off-
limits (we're working to elimina
Currently, you can wrap the JS call in js* like so (js*
"MyLib.doSomething(arg1,arg2)").
So this will pass the compile time without resolving the external lib
calls.
It is worth noting that you may come across an interesting problem
that I did in similar scenario to yours.
If you set the optimizat
I'm looking into using clojurescript on our website. However, we have
several external js libraries that we need to access from
ClojureScript. Is there a way to execute javascript code from
ClojureScript and not have the function names resolved at compile
time?
Basically I want to do:
(foo "test"
