On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 11:37 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>
>>> By now I'm rather sure this would trigger an error, as nothing but an
>>> immediate call of Article. seems acceptable for ds/save!.
>>
>> Why do you say that? Either your ds-save! is a function
On 03/25/2011 11:37 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
Interesting, but you just listed title and body twice, where the goal was to
not list them at all (except in the definition of Article and in the html
form, of course, though theoretically, the form could be generated from a a
bit richer single definitio
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On 03/25/2011 01:34 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>
>> What about this? First, use :title and :body keywords instead of
>> "title" and "body" strings as keys in form-params. Then define this
>> utility function:
>>
>> (defn get-seq [m & kws]
>> (
Hi,
On 25 Mrz., 10:09, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> Interesting, but you just listed title and body twice, where the goal
> was to not list them at all (except in the definition of Article and in
> the html form, of course, though theoretically, the form could be
> generated from a a bit richer singl
On 03/25/2011 01:34 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
What about this? First, use :title and :body keywords instead of
"title" and "body" strings as keys in form-params. Then define this
utility function:
(defn get-seq [m& kws]
((apply juxt kws) m))
which takes a map and one or more keywords (cannot be
What about this? First, use :title and :body keywords instead of
"title" and "body" strings as keys in form-params. Then define this
utility function:
(defn get-seq [m & kws]
((apply juxt kws) m))
which takes a map and one or more keywords (cannot be other types of
key) and returns a seq (actua
On 03/24/2011 09:38 PM, Alan wrote:
A macro should work fine if you use ~@ instead of just ~.
(defmacro save-article
[path form-params timestamp]
`(ds/save! (Article. ~path ~@(vals form-params) ~timestamp)))
Thanks for the suggestion, but:
Unknown location:
error: java.lang.Illega
I find it easier to write web apps if my users provide me with their
inputs at compile time anyway.
On Mar 24, 1:45 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.03.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Alan:
>
> > A macro should work fine if you use ~@ instead of just ~.
>
> > (defmacro save-article
> > [path
Hi,
Am 24.03.2011 um 21:38 schrieb Alan:
> A macro should work fine if you use ~@ instead of just ~.
>
> (defmacro save-article
> [path form-params timestamp]
> `(ds/save! (Article. ~path ~@(vals form-params) ~timestamp)))
A macro works only with literal maps.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You rec
A macro should work fine if you use ~@ instead of just ~.
(defmacro save-article
[path form-params timestamp]
`(ds/save! (Article. ~path ~@(vals form-params) ~timestamp)))
On Mar 24, 1:28 pm, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On 03/24/2011 05:40 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>
> > The problem is the
On 03/24/2011 05:40 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
The problem is the constructor call. With plain old clojure
functions you could use apply, but Java method and constructor
calls must be hard-wired in the bytecode (and hence at
compilation time) (if I understood this correctly).
Guess that's wh
Hi,
On 24 Mrz., 16:16, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> (defn save-article
> [path form-params timestamp]
> (ds/save! (Article. path (form-params "title") (form-params "body")
> timestamp
>
The problem is the constructor call. With plain old clojure
functions you could use ap
Thorsten Wilms writes:
Hi Thorsten,
> The following simplified code works:
>
> (defn save-article
> [path form-params timestamp]
> (ds/save! (Article. path (form-params "title") (form-params "body")
> timestamp
>
>
> But I would like to not handle the content of form-param
Hi!
The following simplified code works:
(defn save-article
[path form-params timestamp]
(ds/save! (Article. path (form-params "title") (form-params "body")
timestamp
But I would like to not handle the content of form-params explicitly.
My naive attempt that shows that I
14 matches
Mail list logo
