Cedric Greevey:
> Then he has a problem, since it doesn't work with reify and proxy, and
> gen-class, deftype, and defrecord are top-level things that don't play
> nice with putting them inside a defn.
>
I do not need them to be inside defn. They will be used as defn and defrecord
are
used, in
Chris Perkins:
> You may want to dig a little deeper into why reify was not working for you.
> As far as I can tell, the classes created by reify do have a public, no-arg
> constructor, as you require:
>
> user> (-> (reify Runnable (run [_])) type .getConstructors seq)
> (#
> #)
I have tried
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Cedric Greevey writes:
>
> Hi Cedric,
>
>>> Do I see it correctly that you need a way (1) to have objects
>>> implementing Job which (2) can be instantiated with a zero-args
>>> constructor and (3) whose execute behavior is customizable by
>>
You may want to dig a little deeper into why reify was not working for you.
As far as I can tell, the classes created by reify do have a public, no-arg
constructor, as you require:
user> (-> (reify Runnable (run [_])) type .getConstructors seq)
(# #)
- Chris
--
You received this message becau
Cedric Greevey writes:
Hi Cedric,
>> Do I see it correctly that you need a way (1) to have objects
>> implementing Job which (2) can be instantiated with a zero-args
>> constructor and (3) whose execute behavior is customizable by
>> providing an arbitrary function f on the JobExecutionContext?
Tassilo Horn:
> Generally, proxy is for creating proxy objects, and the generation of a
> class is more or less a side effect.
>
> Do I see it correctly that you need a way (1) to have objects
> implementing Job which (2) can be instantiated with a zero-args
> constructor and (3) whose execute be
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Michael Klishin writes:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> I am trying to make it possible to use functions as Quartz jobs for my
>> Clojure DSL on top of Quartz [1]. For that, I need to implement a
>> simple 1-method interface. Both gen-class and defrecor
Michael Klishin writes:
Hi Michael,
> I am trying to make it possible to use functions as Quartz jobs for my
> Clojure DSL on top of Quartz [1]. For that, I need to implement a
> simple 1-method interface. Both gen-class and defrecord with
> additional methods work great but seem too heavyweight
Hi,
I am trying to make it possible to use functions as Quartz jobs for my Clojure
DSL on top of
Quartz [1]. For that, I need to implement a simple 1-method interface. Both
gen-class and defrecord with additional methods work great but seem too
heavyweight in many cases so I am trying to add fun
