Hi Tim,
somebody already filed a bug under IE8,
https://github.com/Prismatic/dommy/issues/57
according to the absence of js/Element, the fix may not work. I'll test it
later.
Joe
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:34:42 AM UTC+8, Tim Visher wrote:
>
> Hi Xiangtao,
>
> If you needed to delete
Hi Xiangtao,
If you needed to delete dommy in order to get thing working in IE6,
_please_ file a bug report. I like dommy a lot and finding everywhere
that it breaks compatibility with older browsers is crucial for its
success.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Xiangtao Zhou wrote:
> hi David,
>
hi David,
Thanks. You're right, I delete dommy, it works.
On Monday, December 16, 2013 9:10:18 PM UTC+8, David Powell wrote:
>
> The clojure.browser namespace does try to extend a protocol to
> js/EventType - which IE6 doesn't have, but if you use third party
> alternatives, raw javascript DOM
The clojure.browser namespace does try to extend a protocol to js/EventType
- which IE6 doesn't have, but if you use third party alternatives, raw
javascript DOM manipulation, or Google Closure, then things should work in
IE6.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Xiangtao Zhou wrote:
> hi all,
>
>
Everyone should give up IE6. And, preferably, every other version of IE.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Xiangtao Zhou wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I'm new for clojurescript. I found there is compatibility problem under
> IE6, closurescript use Element which IE 6 dos not have.
>
> Line 34266, Elemen
hi all,
I'm new for clojurescript. I found there is compatibility problem under
IE6, closurescript use Element which IE 6 dos not have.
Line 34266, Element.prototype.clojure$browser$event$EventType$ = true;
Is clojurescript give up IE6?
Joe
--
--
You received this message because you ar
