On 16 dec, 21:48, Joe wrote:
> a. Offer new clojure features in binary form to developers who pay
> $100 a year 3 months before everyone else.
Would stifle development and piss off everybody who's working with
clojure and doesn't want to pay.
> b. Run a clojure programmer temp and/or high level
>
>
> e. Find a business for whom Clojure is a critical piece of technology.
>
It is the easiest way to fund it. However AFAIK there is no big/profitable
business depending on clojure solely...yet
Everything else would eat into Rich's time and hence may not be such a good
thing.
--
You received
All of these seem to distract from the activity we're trying to fund:
the development of Clojure. If the current approach can bring in
enough money, it strikes me as fairly ideal. We'll just have to wait
and see if it does.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
G
a. Offer new clojure features in binary form to developers who pay
$100 a year 3 months before everyone else.
b. Run a clojure programmer temp and/or high level consulting agency.
c. Charge for cert testing and training.
d. Sell for access to online library api calls.
e. Find a business for whom Cl
