Hi,
On 28 Mrz., 07:11, Alan wrote:
> (1) lazy-cat is old. There's no reason to use it anymore; lazy-seq is
> better for generating custom lazy seqs, and concat is already lazy.
You confuse this with lazy-cons. lazy-cat is just a really lazy
version of concat and there is no reason not to use it
(1) lazy-cat is old. There's no reason to use it anymore; lazy-seq is
better for generating custom lazy seqs, and concat is already lazy.
(2) declare is overkill for this; just use letfn and avoid creating a
bunch of global functions that nobody else will ever use.
On Mar 27, 9:43 am, Christian Sc
Finally! I have a solution. You can have a look at it here:
https://gist.github.com/889354/
I would like to hear comments about how to do it better or in a more
idiomatic clojure way.
Especially I am uncertain about my use of "binding" and the top level
declares. I needed the ability to reference
I understand now the problem. Clojure is really not lazy enough :) I
was forgetting that clojure evaluates its function arguments eagerly
like lisp and not lazily like haskell.
I have to wrap the function arguments that should be evaluated lazily
into closures "(fn [] value)".
Once I have a solut
Hi all,
I am continuing on my path to explore clojure in more detail and am
trying to implement the following haskell algorithm in clojure:
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~lloyd/tildeFP/Haskell/1998/Edit01/
Even after trying several different approaches and investing several
hours I do not seem to
