That is a very clear explanation. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubs
> Still I don't really understand WHY the gensym is called at different
> times. Is this a special case when you use genclass in a macro? Or
> should I be aware of other cases too?
What happens is that gen-class (and gen-interface) macroes don't
expand to anything (nil to be exact), but they have
Hmm... seems you're right. If I fix the name of the post-init method,
instead of using a gensym, it works. (Actually, that was exactly what
I was doing to get the two-macro-version working).
Still I don't really understand WHY the gensym is called at different
times. Is this a special case when yo
Hi,
Try changing the name of your post-init function to something like
(symbol (str (name cname "-post-init"))), maybe your problem is that
gensym generates different symbols at runtime.
--
Krešimir Šojat
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" gro
I think I have an interesting problem. I'm trying to create a macro
that generates a class AND a post-init method for the class. Something
like:
;;; create the macro
(defmacro definstance [name & body]
(let [post-init (gensym "postinit")]
`(do
(defn ~(symbol (str "-" post-init)) [this
