On 07.02.2009, at 10:48, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>>>
>>> user> (apply + 1 2 3 [4 5])
>> Exactly - except that it doesn't work for me!
>
> Do you mabe have some more specific information
> than "it doesn't work"? This form works for me and
> in fact always did.
On my home machine, it works as we
Hello,
user> (apply + 1 2 3 [4 5])
Exactly - except that it doesn't work for me!
Do you mabe have some more specific information
than "it doesn't work"? This form works for me and
in fact always did.
Do you maybe try: (apply + 1 [2 3] 4)?
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cr
On 06.02.2009, at 19:22, Shawn Hoover wrote:
> This seems to work correctly:
>
> user> (apply + 1 2 3 [4 5])
> 15
>
> Is that what you're looking for?
Exactly - except that it doesn't work for me!
Konrad.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because y
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> The doc string of apply says:
>
>([f args* argseq])
>"Applies fn f to the argument list formed by prepending args to
> argseq."
>
> This looks like I could pass in several argument PLUS one sequence of
> arguments, which just
The doc string of apply says:
([f args* argseq])
"Applies fn f to the argument list formed by prepending args to
argseq."
This looks like I could pass in several argument PLUS one sequence of
arguments, which just happens to be what I want in a specific case.
But it doesn't
