On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Laurent Droin wrote:
> Ah, thank you. "interleave" is what I was looking for. I looked for "weave",
> "zip", "map", "concat", and all the "see also" but did not find "interleave".
> Interleave will of course not handle the last value in the categories
> collection
(concat sequence [val])
would often be preferable to
(conj (into [] sequence) val)
because the former solution maintains laziness.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Laurent Droin wrote:
> Ah, thank you. "interleave" is what I was looking for. I looked for
> "weave", "zip", "map", "concat", and
Ah, thank you. "interleave" is what I was looking for. I looked for
"weave", "zip", "map", "concat", and all the "see also" but did not find
"interleave".
Interleave will of course not handle the last value in the categories
collection so my first instinct will be to call (into [] ) on the map
You may be interested in the core function 'interleave'. As for (into []), it's
perfectly idiomatic as long as you actually need to return a vector and not
just some kind of sequence (the more common case). But note also the
mapv/filterv/reduce-kv family of functions, though they're not directly
Hi,
Continuing my little pet project (small program really) to learn Clojure, I
am now working on a function whose description would be something like:
"Returns a collection 'weaving' 2 collections (boundaries into
categories).
Boundaries must have one element less than categories.
For exa
