kground in Java. After writing
> > Clojure code for a month or so now, I find myself struggling with
> > function size. If I have expressions that can be grouped by
> > association, then I can re-factor these expression(s) into a
> > function. However, the newly re-factored f
.
On Sunday, May 30, 2010, jbs wrote:
> I'm new to Clojure and have a long background in Java. After writing
> Clojure code for a month or so now, I find myself struggling with
> function size. If I have expressions that can be grouped by
> association, then I can re-factor
idiomatic for introducing a private
var. You can also do this with explicit {:private true} metadata on the name.
Cheers,
Stu
> I'm new to Clojure and have a long background in Java. After writing
> Clojure code for a month or so now, I find myself struggling with
> function size.
I'm new to Clojure and have a long background in Java. After writing
Clojure code for a month or so now, I find myself struggling with
function size. If I have expressions that can be grouped by
association, then I can re-factor these expression(s) into a
function. However, the new
