This isn't fully tested, but it should work. Lisp doesn't need
fixing.
(defmacro switch [choice-seq & clause-maps]
(let [choice (first choice-seq)
clauses (map #(apply concat %) clause-maps)]
`(condp = ~choice ~@(apply concat (map (fn [clause]
[
Thanks to all!
I think I should use another (more fun or irrelevant - based on one's
eye-line!) example for custom "form separators"; something like this:
(switch (choice)
{my-choice
(having-fun)
}
{(your-choice)
(being-pragmatic)
}
{(their-choice)
(lisp
Lisp syntax needs some fixing ?
It's not April 1st yet or did I hibernate through winter suddenly ?
I'll run to the window to see if my tulips
are out
:)))
Luc
Sent from my iPod
On Dec 24, 2009, at 1:58 PM, kaveh_shahbazian wrote:
> Well; this is a fun tradition after all and number o
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:58 PM, kaveh_shahbazian <
kaveh.shahbaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This has been done in Clojure to some extend for Vectors and Sets.
> What if we could choose a custom separator in out macros? For example
> `begin and `end? This way one can write code in more common flavors
>
> So If I look ridiculous, I apologize in advance.
>
>
Don't worry, you'd be in good company anyway :)
Why don't you implement it and try it? It should be fairly easy to create a
translator that would turn any of those proposals into regular clojure
before compiling. Try it out for a while, see
Well; this is a fun tradition after all and number of participants is
huge! (All failed of-course :) )
Is short idea is:
Having the choice of custom separators.
This has been done in Clojure to some extend for Vectors and Sets.
What if we could choose a custom separator in out macros? For example
