On 2008.11.15., at 15:25, Rich Hickey wrote:
> Welcome Attila,
>
> I've run findbugs on Clojure before and cleaned up a few things. These
> that you mentioned, however, stand as a good example of such an
> analyzer not knowing enough, and I count as spurious, if well-
> intended.
>
> As mentione
On Nov 15, 4:53 am, Attila Szegedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I run FindBugs on Clojure source code, and there are few things it
> uncovered. I'd be happy to fix these and submit patches (after I
> submitted a contributor agreement), except if someone already a
> contributor want
On 2008.11.15., at 14:23, Phil Jordan wrote:
>
> Hi Attila,
>
> I can't comment on the other issues, but:
>
> Attila Szegedi wrote:
>> 2. Keyword and Ref define compareTo, but don't redefine equals (and
>> hashCode) to be consistent with it. It ain't necessarily a problem if
>> you know what you'
Hi Attila,
I can't comment on the other issues, but:
Attila Szegedi wrote:
> 2. Keyword and Ref define compareTo, but don't redefine equals (and
> hashCode) to be consistent with it. It ain't necessarily a problem if
> you know what you're doing, but since they're public it's usually a
> g
Hi folks,
I run FindBugs on Clojure source code, and there are few things it
uncovered. I'd be happy to fix these and submit patches (after I
submitted a contributor agreement), except if someone already a
contributor wants to tackle these instead (they're easy to fix for the
most part).
