Thanks.
That sound good.
I had played with eval, but wasn happy about this.
2013/7/31 Cedric Greevey
> If you saved the original function instance, you can use it to find the
> map. This should work:
>
> (let [f #(+ 1 1)
> s #{{:a 3 :b 5 :c f}}]
> (contains? s {:a 3 :b 5 :c f}))
>
> No
If you saved the original function instance, you can use it to find the
map. This should work:
(let [f #(+ 1 1)
s #{{:a 3 :b 5 :c f}}]
(contains? s {:a 3 :b 5 :c f}))
Note that the value for the :c key is now the same *instance* of that
function.
Storing the function source, with ', inst
Ups. [?]
Sorry.
Have not seen this typo :(.
2013/7/31 Jim
> On 31/07/13 11:01, Goldritter wrote:
>
>> But when I tried to access the value I got an Exception
>> =>(c: {:a 3 :h 5 :c '#(+ 1 1)})
>> RuntimeException Invalid token: c: clojure.lang.Util.**runtimeException
>> (Util.java:219)
>> {:a 3
On 31/07/13 11:19, Jim wrote:
On 31/07/13 11:01, Goldritter wrote:
But when I tried to access the value I got an Exception
=>(c: {:a 3 :h 5 :c '#(+ 1 1)})
RuntimeException Invalid token: c: clojure.lang.Util.runtimeException
(Util.java:219)
{:a 3, :c (fn* [] (+ 1 1)), :h 5}
The same with get
On 31/07/13 11:01, Goldritter wrote:
But when I tried to access the value I got an Exception
=>(c: {:a 3 :h 5 :c '#(+ 1 1)})
RuntimeException Invalid token: c: clojure.lang.Util.runtimeException
(Util.java:219)
{:a 3, :c (fn* [] (+ 1 1)), :h 5}
The same with get
=> (get {:a 3 :h 5 :c '#(+ 1 1)
I have following problem.
I have a set with different objects (maps). Normally the maps contains only
a key with a value which is a number or a collection.
For example like this:
(def testset #{ {:a 3 :b 5 :c 6}
{:a 3 :b 5 :c 7}
{:a 3 :b 5 :c 8}
