> what makes you think posting to a general-interest list will have the effect
> you desire?
(LOL) Indeed. And to prove it, here's the de rigueur retort of
opensourceland: you fix it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this g
On 04/13/2011 08:56 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
Since these issues have been raised on the Enclojure Google Group by
various people repeatedly over the last couple of years, to no effect,
it seems th
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>
>> Since these issues have been raised on the Enclojure Google Group by
>> various people repeatedly over the last couple of years, to no effect,
>> it seems that they need to be raised elsewh
On 04/13/2011 08:45 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
Since these issues have been raised on the Enclojure Google Group by
various people repeatedly over the last couple of years, to no effect,
it seems that they need to be raised elsewhere to actually get t
On Apr 13, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> Since these issues have been raised on the Enclojure Google Group by
> various people repeatedly over the last couple of years, to no effect,
> it seems that they need to be raised elsewhere to actually get the
> attention they deserve.
>
> Someo
There are several buggy behaviors of the Enclojure REPL that are
annoying me. Enclojure has gone through several upgrades over the past
year or two without any of these being fixed, despite the fact that
people have reported these problems more than once on the Enclojure
Google Group during that ti
