On Jul 8, 7:14 pm, nchubrich wrote:
> > I disagree. This is a subject of religious debates that I don't want to get
> > into in detail, but FWIW this educator thinks that Lisp > is a perfectly
> > defensible first language and that Clojure can serve the purpose quite well
> > as long as insta
> I disagree. This is a subject of religious debates that I don't want to get
> into in detail, but FWIW this educator thinks that Lisp > is a perfectly
> defensible first language and that Clojure can serve the purpose quite well
> as long as installation and tooling
> doesn't make it unnecessa
