Re: EPL 2.0

Sorry for the late response, I had somehow disabled notifications from this thread. Thank you for your answers. I am far from a legal expert, but I had to do some research about the licensing matters as I am in a bit of a dead end situation: I work for an NGO that works a lot with European proj

Re: EPL 2.0

On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-6, Daniel Compton wrote: > > > Alex: it looks like this was your email about concerns > you and > Rich had. I can see Mike Milinkovich had some followups with answers, do > they sati

Re: EPL 2.0

Hi Aspasia Clojars and the Software Freedom Conservancy have been looking at the EPL 2.0 license and the impact of Clojure libraries adopting it, particularly around GPL compatibility. However I suspect that even if all Clojure libraries adopt the GPL compatibility clause, it would still need

Re: EPL 2.0

Hi Aspasia, We provided some feedback in the early discussions around EPL 2.0. I haven't looked closely at the final result, but I don't think a lot of those concerns were addressed and it's unlikely that Clojure will switch to EPL 2.0. Alex On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at

EPL 2.0

Hi there, are there any plans of licensing Clojure with EPL 2.0 in the future? I am interested in terms of GPL compatibility which as stated here <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License> : *In terms of GPL compatibility, the new license allows the initial contributor to