Hi,
On Jun 28, 5:38 am, Brian Hurt wrote:
> This is actually something that has been bugging me for a while. Most of
> the time this isn't a problem (being unable to generate classes in the repl,
> basically), except in one case: exceptions. It'd be nice to be able to
> define classes that inh
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:54 PM, rob levy wrote:
> HI Michael,
>
> If I understand correctly, the proxy function might be what you are looking
> for. I think gen-class can only be used with AOT compilation.
>
> -Rob
>
>
This is actually something that has been bugging me for a while. Most of
th
HI Michael,
If I understand correctly, the proxy function might be what you are looking
for. I think gen-class can only be used with AOT compilation.
-Rob
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Michael Jaaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to generate class in runtime and then use it?
> How far I
Hi,
Is there any way to generate class in runtime and then use it?
How far I can only generate interfaces.
This works:
(do
(gen-interface :name test.commons.Me
:methods [[ me [ String ] void ]])
(def z (reify test.commons.Me
(me [t z] (println "hello wor
