> bigfun (comp retire-host slowdown-host infect-hosts naturalrecovery-
> host pair-host)
> proc1 (future (doseq [i (subvec world 0 2499)] (bigfun i)))
> proc2 (future (doseq [i (subvec world 2500 4999)] (bigfun i)))
> proc3 (future (doseq [i (subvec world 5000 7499)] (bigfun i)))
> proc4 (future
I've written individual-based models using agents, and using refs.
Currently my decision tree is 'agents, if there are no events which
need to be atomically synchronized between individuals**'.
In both cases I had a vector full of individuals called 'world'. When
the individuals were agents, I c
>> How do you decide which construct to use for a particular algorithm/
>> program?
it would be nifty keen nice if there were some cute visual flow charty
representation of people's decision tree? maybe something that can get
'crowd sourced' on some wiki page somewhere. some day.
--~--~-
On Apr 15, 4:12 pm, Robert Feldt wrote:
> Although I understand each of the concurrency "primitives"/systems
> (stm, agents, atoms, dynvars) in isolation I find it harder to choose
> wisely between them when designing/implementing specific algorithms
> and programs.
>
> Do you have any advice/t
On Apr 15, 4:12 pm, Robert Feldt wrote:
> Although I understand each of the concurrency "primitives"/systems
> (stm, agents, atoms, dynvars) in isolation I find it harder to choose
> wisely between them when designing/implementing specific algorithms
> and programs.
>
> Do you have any advice/t
Although I understand each of the concurrency "primitives"/systems
(stm, agents, atoms, dynvars) in isolation I find it harder to choose
wisely between them when designing/implementing specific algorithms
and programs.
Do you have any advice/tips for how to choose between Clojure's
different conc
