> I would propose no changes to Clojure, no
> conditional compilation techniques or reader modifications. Just
> things like macros that have simple functionality and that at most
> check one flag to conditionalize output.
I wouldn't immediately object to reader macro conditionalization here.
On Nov 3, 9:08 am, Sean Devlin wrote:
> My understanding is that the current expectation is to allow
> differences in the way each platform does its job. Contrib currently
> is expected to behave differently on the CLR and the JVM. For
> example, the str-utils and sql-utils libraries would need
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:09 PM, dmiller wrote:
> I have a few ideas for this, but welcome design input from anyone
> with an interest.
>
> It's this, or write a a really nasty Perl script. :)
You dare to threaten us??!
:)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
veloper code.
>
> Have I understood this right? What will be the best way to go about
> writing and managing a cross-platform Clojure library?
>
> Best regards,
> jim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
ureCLR will therefore be a parallel
implementation of Clojure, rather than an alternative core under a
larger pure Clojure universe of contrib libraries and developer code.
Have I understood this right? What will be the best way to go about
writing and managing a cross-platform
