On Apr 26, 4:54 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Dan wrote:
>
> > I'm a Java developer; I work on a project that has adopted Clojure's
> > data structures as a convenient implementation of immutable sets,
> > maps, etc. In attempting to add type parameters to the Clojure
> >
On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Dan wrote:
I'm a Java developer; I work on a project that has adopted Clojure's
data structures as a convenient implementation of immutable sets,
maps, etc. In attempting to add type parameters to the Clojure
interfaces, I noticed a conflict in the definition of
IP
Bumping.
Let me emphasize this paragraph, which is really the crux of the
problem:
> Put another way, the problem is that if I have an Associative which I
> know maps integers to strings, and I invoke seq(), I don't know what
> kind of values I'm going to get.
Is this expected behavior or a bug?
I'm a Java developer; I work on a project that has adopted Clojure's
data structures as a convenient implementation of immutable sets,
maps, etc. In attempting to add type parameters to the Clojure
interfaces, I noticed a conflict in the definition of
IPersistentVector. I assume the problem exist
