You can also use let instead of with. If you have multiple tests inside let
wrap them in a context call.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members a
"context" might be what you're looking for.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsu
My usual approach is to use a macro that expands to the appropriate (it) forms,
or have a helper function that is called inside each (it)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
No
Hi,
I've been getting quite excited about integrating Speclj via its
auto-runner into my mixed CLJ/CLJS Org-mode/Babel setup, but now
feeling a bit lost how to go about wrapping a number of test
characteristics ("(it)" forms in speclj parlance) into re-usable
units. In the assertions below I'd lik