I'm studying clojurescript/closure to better understand if using
clojurescript could be really a step ahead in developing rich web based
application. So, I'm still a newbie. I found in some way useful this google
service http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home to evaluate gclosure
benefits fo
On 9/18/2012 8:57 AM, David Nolen wrote:
I've heard of several large
ClojureScript programs that generate 1.2-1.8 *megabytes* of
JavaScript. After advanced compilation and gzipping the applications
are around 40k-50k (http://blog.mezeske.com/?p=552). This is pretty
impressive given that jQuery, w
Hi,
Matt Campbell writes:
> When run in advanced mode, the Google Closure Compiler tries to
> eliminate dead code. This currently doesn't seem to be very effective
> for ClojureScript. A minimal hello-world example currently compiles to
> 90 KB in advanced mode. Is this the best that can be d
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Matt Campbell wrote:
> When run in advanced mode, the Google Closure Compiler tries to eliminate
> dead code. This currently doesn't seem to be very effective for
> ClojureScript. A minimal hello-world example currently compiles to 90 KB in
> advanced mode. Is this
When run in advanced mode, the Google Closure Compiler tries to
eliminate dead code. This currently doesn't seem to be very effective
for ClojureScript. A minimal hello-world example currently compiles to
90 KB in advanced mode. Is this the best that can be done? Is Clojure's
dynamism an insurm
