On Monday, April 2, 2012 8:54:07 AM UTC-5, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
>
> See [1]: "Agents are currently not implemented"
>
> They wouldn't be very useful, as javascript is single threaded in most
> implementations.
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
>
Even
except for atoms of course...
On 02/04/12 14:55, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
I don't think any of the concurrency primitives made it to
clojureScript...
On 02/04/12 14:54, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
See [1]: "Agents are currently not implemented"
They wouldn't be very useful, as javascript is single t
I don't think any of the concurrency primitives made it to clojureScript...
On 02/04/12 14:54, Moritz Ulrich wrote:
See [1]: "Agents are currently not implemented"
They wouldn't be very useful, as javascript is single threaded in most
implementations.
[1]: https://github.com/clojure/clojuresc
See [1]: "Agents are currently not implemented"
They wouldn't be very useful, as javascript is single threaded in most
implementations.
[1]: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/wiki/Differences-from-Clojure
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 14:56, Pierre-Henry Perret wrote:
> The following clojurescr
The following clojurescript code :
(def *peers* (agent {}))
compiles to this js code:
one.peer.peer._STAR_peers_STAR_ = one.peer.peer.agent.call(null,cljs.
core.ObjMap.fromObject([],{}));
which throws
_
1. Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'call' of undefined
1. (
