Hi,
On 26 Okt., 13:17, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> As an aside: You will not be able to just run benchmarks carefully tuned for
> 1.2 under 1.3 and get best performance, as some of the performance tricks are
> now counter-indicated.
Is there some documentation how tuning against 1.3 works? I got
It would be very good if 1.3 delivers on its goal, and it is nice to
see that performance is important to the core team.
Here's the quick test on binarytrees benchmark that I submitted to the
shootout. It is not optimized at all, besides eliminating reflection
warnings. On my box results for "binar
The 1.3 release for Clojure aims for parity with Java performance, with less
explicit optimization and hinting than required in 1.2 (or in Java). It would
be great to have people in the community share the effort of writing and
testing benchmarks, and to facilitate this I have created a top-leve
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:27, Santosh Rajan wrote:
> Here is another speed comparison. Of note is that there is another jvm based
> lisp dialect kawa.
> http://per.bothner.com/blog/2010/Kawa-in-shootout/
Yes, this one is interesting. Might not figuring out what Kawa is
doing differently yield so
Here is another speed comparison. Of note is that there is another jvm based
lisp dialect kawa.
http://per.bothner.com/blog/2010/Kawa-in-shootout/
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Marko Kocić wrote:
> Clojure has recently been added to http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
> benchmarks. I know ther
Maybe optimizing now is a bit early, as a lot of the performance
caracteristics of clojure programs will
change with 1.3.
Might be better to start writing programs that will be fast with 1.3.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Marko Kocić wrote:
> Clojure has recently been added to http://shootout
Clojure has recently been added to http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
benchmarks. I know there are a lot of objections and excuses about
this benchmark, but that is defacto go to place when talking about
language implementation performance.
The problems is that performance is not that great as it
