Re: Clojure on Wikipedia

2009-05-04 Thread Rayne
I second this notion. On May 4, 9:21 am, Mibu wrote: > Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0! > > Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice. > > Today, when people want to know something new they first go to > Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot

Clojure on Wikipedia

2009-05-04 Thread Mibu
Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0! Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice. Today, when people want to know something new they first go to Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot of new interest in Clojure now that it has reached 1.0. Please h

Clojure on Wikipedia

2008-09-16 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi, No doubt many individuals interested in Clojure are aware of its Wikipedia entry, though I just now found it. It's a pretty terse page, including only a single paragraph of actual content (its history page is longer...) and could probably stand some elaboration. E.g., Clojure's STM and ot