I second this notion.
On May 4, 9:21 am, Mibu wrote:
> Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0!
>
> Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice.
>
> Today, when people want to know something new they first go to
> Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot
Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0!
Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice.
Today, when people want to know something new they first go to
Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot of
new interest in Clojure now that it has reached 1.0.
Please h
Hi,
No doubt many individuals interested in Clojure are aware of its
Wikipedia entry, though I just now found it.
It's a pretty terse page, including only a single paragraph of actual
content (its history page is longer...) and could probably stand some
elaboration. E.g., Clojure's STM and ot