2011/2/25 Phil Hagelberg
> On Feb 24, 2:48 am, Paul Richards wrote:
> > My goodness.. Seems like a can of worms. :p
> >
> > I think I'll pick something at least two levels deep like
> > "pauldoo.someproject", complete with ".core" and ".tools" as sub
> > namespaces..
>
> IMO adding ".core" ind
On Feb 24, 2:48 am, Paul Richards wrote:
> My goodness.. Seems like a can of worms. :p
>
> I think I'll pick something at least two levels deep like
> "pauldoo.someproject", complete with ".core" and ".tools" as sub
> namespaces..
IMO adding ".core" indicates it's a "filler" segment that's only
FWIW, I've settled on cemerick.project-name as my default. I think the
project-name.core convention cropped up because of hesitancy of some to use
their name at the top level.
- Chas
On Feb 24, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Paul Richards wrote:
> My goodness.. Seems like a can of worms. :p
>
> I think
My goodness.. Seems like a can of worms. :p
I think I'll pick something at least two levels deep like
"pauldoo.someproject", complete with ".core" and ".tools" as sub
namespaces..
On 23 February 2011 20:35, Mark Rathwell wrote:
>
> This discussion has been had multiple times on this list, no
This discussion has been had multiple times on this list, not sure how much
new information you will get. See the following for a couple examples:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/968e9066223c3a2b/fbce84869dbf4ce6?lnk=gst#
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_t
Hi,
Is there a guide to the conventions for naming and structuring
namespaces in a Clojure project?
I see for example that the ".core" namespace is fairly common in
different projects. Is this also where the "-main" entry point should
live?
Also is it typical to have code living in "someproject"
