Re: Clojure is "not a serious language"

2009-01-31 Thread Mark H.
On Jan 30, 8:40 pm, Jon Harrop wrote: > Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely > hillarious: > > http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ Hey, I have to admit, I was scared when I saw you show up here, but now I think I understand

Re: Clojure is "not a serious language"

2009-01-31 Thread Mibu
Check out the comment left by Blue Phil. Priceless. On Jan 31, 6:40 am, Jon Harrop wrote: > Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely > hillarious: > > http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Con

Re: Clojure is "not a serious language"

2009-01-30 Thread David Nolen
Agreed :) On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > > Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely > hillarious: > > http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://ww

Clojure is "not a serious language"

2009-01-30 Thread Jon Harrop
Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely hillarious: http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/ -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Y