i was talking about something related in the chat group, but I'm not good
enough yet to implement it. I want to rewrite the doc method slightly in a
way that would go a LONG way for newbies. The current way actually looks
like java . . . like the parens are around the input params. But that's
ju
More as a note to future Clojure doc'ers than anything else: It seems
that noobies (including myself) get bitten by the lazy versus
immediate evaluation functions all the time (e.g. for versus doseq/
doall). If this problem isn't solved through naming conventions
(probably way too tedious to be
Hello,
As modest as this could be in the quest of a formal categorization, I
find the integrated string pattern search integrated into clojuredev
really useful, so I can't resist to do this shameless plug.
You can see it in action, with a search on the word "string", either
by searching the word
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Mark Addleman
wrote:
>
> I'm a long time Java programmer and, before that, a Smalltalker. One
> of the major biggest challenges I face when picking up a new language
> is getting a working understanding of its libraries. I believe that
> standardizing on a doc
I'm a long time Java programmer and, before that, a Smalltalker. One
of the major biggest challenges I face when picking up a new language
is getting a working understanding of its libraries. I believe that
standardizing on a doc format was a pretty important driver for Java's
success.
As I see
