You're doing amazing work! I look forward to the result.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Paul Stadig wrote:
> I've been speaking with the Terracotta engineers, so here is an update on a
> couple of the issues:
>
> 1) array.clone(). It turns out this is a bug in Terracotta. They have
> acknowled
I've been speaking with the Terracotta engineers, so here is an update on a
couple of the issues:
1) array.clone(). It turns out this is a bug in Terracotta. They have
acknowledged it, and will be working to resolve it. However, they mentioned
(as I have found else where on the interweb[1][2]) tha
On Mar 30, 5:12 pm, Paul Stadig wrote:
> I have gotten to the point in my Clojure + Terracotta experiment, where I
> believe all of the features of Clojure are functional (Refs, Atoms,
> transactions, etc.). I do not have a way to extensively test the Clojure
> functionality, but I have run the
I have gotten to the point in my Clojure + Terracotta experiment, where I
believe all of the features of Clojure are functional (Refs, Atoms,
transactions, etc.). I do not have a way to extensively test the Clojure
functionality, but I have run the clojure.contrib.test-clojure test suites
successfu
