Thank you Sam and Phil for the encouragement. And thanks Phil for getting
it rolling with the initial version.
I'll update the group as soon as I feel I have something ready to test.
Cheers,
Tim
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Sam Aaron wrote:
> Fantastic work Tim. I think this can be a rea
Fantastic work Tim. I think this can be a really important part of the future
for Clojure hacking with Emacs. Let us know how you get on.
Sam
--
http://sam.aaron.name
On Thursday, 26 April 2012 at 15:27, Tim King wrote:
> I have been working on a fork of Phil's nrepl.el for the past few nig
Tim King writes:
> I have been working on a fork of Phil's nrepl.el for the past few
> nights.
> So far I have gotten the basic bencode/bdecode transport working and
> am able to send and receive to an nREPL server.
> Beyond that, it isn't really in anything close to a usable state yet,
> but I p
I have been working on a fork of Phil's nrepl.el for the past few nights.
So far I have gotten the basic bencode/bdecode transport working and am
able to send and receive to an nREPL server.
Beyond that, it isn't really in anything close to a usable state yet, but I
plan to continue plugging away a
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Anyway, I'd be happy if someone went ahead with nrepl.el even so;
> don't let me discourage you.
For what it's worth I sketched out a bare skeleton of what this could
look like. Nothing works yet, but if someone were to want to hack on
it,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:48 AM, ian.tegebo wrote:
> Is anyone working on a Clojure-Specific Emacs Environment? If considered
> but dismissed, then why?
The problem is that swank-clojure+slime offers a local maximum. While
there are difficulties working with CL and Clojure at the same ti
tl;dr
Is anyone working on a Clojure-Specific Emacs Environment? If considered
but dismissed, then why?
I've just reviewed a thread about nREPL. The thread also (somewhat
indirectly) calls into question the current practice of piggy-backing on
SLIME:
"About a netw
