Thanks a million!
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 15:59 Alex Miller wrote:
> Your example does work, but it returns the conformed value [a b c] out of
> the macro, which the compiler then tries to evaluate. So the exception is
> coming downstream.
>
> See:
>
> user=> (macroexpand '(test-macro a b c))
>
Your example does work, but it returns the conformed value [a b c] out of
the macro, which the compiler then tries to evaluate. So the exception is
coming downstream.
See:
user=> (macroexpand '(test-macro a b c))
[a b c]
On Wednesday, November 22, 2017 at 1:08:22 AM UTC-6, Stanislav Yurin wr
Hi,
Please help me understand following behavior.
Speccing macro via fdef and calling explain within a macro works, but
conform tries to resolve all symbols.
How to correctly conform macro body from within a macro?
Longer example:
This works:
(spec/def ::test-spec (spec/* any?))
(spec/fdef tes
