Hi Pedro
That's one idea isn't it. And I suppose you could write a macro for a
'metarecord' to generate both Foo and FooDefinition from a single
concise and convenient definition?
At the other end of the scale there is always the option of a naming
convention - ducks-Set-Of-Birds etc!!
Charles.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Quzanti wrote:
> Thanks Michał
>
> You did understand my intention, and it was the former non-existent
> case I was referring to.
>
> I wanted to attach metadata about type, field arity etc in the
> definition of the record type so that I could write some tools to
Thanks Michał
You did understand my intention, and it was the former non-existent
case I was referring to.
I wanted to attach metadata about type, field arity etc in the
definition of the record type so that I could write some tools to do
intelligent conversion between record structures.
Charles
On 11 July 2010 14:30, Quzanti wrote:
> Please could someone tell me the preferred way of attaching field
> (key?) specific metadata in a defrecord definition?
I'm not sure if I understand your intention correctly, but if I do,
then there is no such thing. If the fields of a particular instance o
Hello
Please could someone tell me the preferred way of attaching field
(key?) specific metadata in a defrecord definition?
And how to I extract this metadata on a field by field basis?
Thank you
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To p
