2009/11/17 Chouser :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jacek Laskowski
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering what part is missing in "which provides a means for
>> nested contexts to communicate with code before it the call stack." at
>> http://clojure.org/vars? I think the wording is broken at the end.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Chouser wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jacek Laskowski
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering what part is missing in "which provides a means for
> > nested contexts to communicate with code before it the call stack." at
> > http://clojure.org/vars? I think th
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> I'm wondering what part is missing in "which provides a means for
> nested contexts to communicate with code before it the call stack." at
> http://clojure.org/vars? I think the wording is broken at the end.
Fixed, thanks.
--Chouser
--
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what part is missing in "which provides a means for
> nested contexts to communicate with code before it the call stack." at
> http://clojure.org/vars? I think the wording is broken at the end.
>
Probably "in":
"whic
Hi,
I'm wondering what part is missing in "which provides a means for
nested contexts to communicate with code before it the call stack." at
http://clojure.org/vars? I think the wording is broken at the end.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
-
