Hi Cedric,
Thanks, I'm feeling really silly now... I should have thought about folds
the first second after encountering this :)
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note t
Why not just (reduce func v l)?
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Bogdan Opanchuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Consider the following problem:
>
> (def v [1 2 3])
> (def l '(4 5 6))
>
> ; we need to apply in sequence
> ; `v <- (func v e)`,
> ; where `e` goes over elements of the list `l`
> (def new-v (ap
Hello,
Consider the following problem:
(def v [1 2 3])
(def l '(4 5 6))
; we need to apply in sequence
; `v <- (func v e)`,
; where `e` goes over elements of the list `l`
(def new-v (apply-from-list func v l))
For example, if `(def func conj)`, then the value of `new-v` is `[1 2 3 4 5
6]`. I
