On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:12:54 +0200
Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Now ... why do newbies want bleeding edge ? There certainly is a
> reason for that. Honestly, if I were a newbie, currently on June 2010,
> 29th, I certainly would like the bleeding edge, after having "heard"
> so much goodness about protoc
2010/6/29 Mike Meyer :
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:54:28 +0200
> Laurent PETIT wrote:
>
>> ... at least it's my opinion : we should stop consider newbies are as
>> excited as us by the idea of working with SNAPSHOT dependencies which
>> work day A, break day B.
>>
>> So I think we should have no
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:54:28 +0200
Laurent PETIT wrote:
> ... at least it's my opinion : we should stop consider newbies are as
> excited as us by the idea of working with SNAPSHOT dependencies which
> work day A, break day B.
>
> So I think we should have no SNAPSHOT dependencies in the Ge
Course, this seems ideal.
But I'm pretty sure that already 80% of the value will come if we just
correctly "control" what we deliver to newbies in terms of fixed
dependency graph.
2010/6/29 Tim Daly :
> This is a well-solved problem in open source.
>
> It involves keep a "gold version" of the sys
This is a well-solved problem in open source.
It involves keep a "gold version" of the system on some well-known
site (e.g. sourceforge) and a "silver version" on another well-known
site (e.g. github).
The gold version is released on a regular basis (say, once every 2
months). It is tested using
... at least it's my opinion : we should stop consider newbies are as
excited as us by the idea of working with SNAPSHOT dependencies which
work day A, break day B.
So I think we should have no SNAPSHOT dependencies in the Getting
Starting docs, or transitive SNAPSHOT dependencies.
We can st
