Re: Preparing for Release 1.0 (was: Re: 20081217 Release)

2008-12-19 Thread Bill Clementson
Hi Meikel, On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > On 19 Dez., 02:10, bc wrote: >> For clojure-contrib, it would make sense to create a matching tarball >> whenever a Clojure release occurs. For the other 3, it would be >> necessary for someone to test and save off a copy o

Re: Preparing for Release 1.0 (was: Re: 20081217 Release)

2008-12-19 Thread Mon Key
> I would propose, that the files are hosted where ever > they are hosted now with suitable labels with which > Clojure version they work. This works out of the box > with the least amount of trouble. > > Meikel In contrast to the monolithic GG Code repo or C*AN or git/hg/bzr.*hubs I find that th

Re: Preparing for Release 1.0 (was: Re: 20081217 Release)

2008-12-18 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, On 19 Dez., 02:10, bc wrote: > For clojure-contrib, it would make sense to create a matching tarball > whenever a Clojure release occurs. For the other 3, it would be > necessary for someone to test and save off a copy of the libraries > somewhere (that by itself  would make getting started

Preparing for Release 1.0 (was: Re: 20081217 Release)

2008-12-18 Thread bc
On Dec 18, 5:46 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > I've cut a new release, 20081217, which is available from Google Code: > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_20081217.zip Reading noob comments on this list, I suspect many people downloaded the September Clojure tarball and tried (with mixed su

Re: 20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Mark Volkmann
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > FYI, I noticed that the readme.txt in the release still says to run > with clojure.lang.Repl, when all you need now is: > java -jar clojure.jar I wonder how many people will really use it that way (with -jar). The problem is that you can'

Re: 20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Rich Hickey
On Dec 18, 10:44 am, Stuart Sierra wrote: > FYI, I noticed that the readme.txt in the release still says to run > with clojure.lang.Repl, when all you need now is: > java -jar clojure.jar > Starting with -jar shuts down the classpath, so is not something I think you want to show someone, as th

Re: 20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Stuart Sierra
FYI, I noticed that the readme.txt in the release still says to run with clojure.lang.Repl, when all you need now is: java -jar clojure.jar -Stuart Sierra On Dec 18, 8:46 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > I've cut a new release, 20081217, which is available from Google Code: > > http://clojure.googleco

Re: 20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Rich Hickey
On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Mark Fredrickson wrote: > >> This release should facilitate everyone using the same post-AOT API, >> and brings us closer to the 1.0 release. I'll be going through the >> docs to bring them up to date. If you are using an old release, >> please >> move to this one

Re: 20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Mark Fredrickson
> This release should facilitate everyone using the same post-AOT API, > and brings us closer to the 1.0 release. I'll be going through the > docs to bring them up to date. If you are using an old release, please > move to this one, as it is what the documentation will reflect moving > forward. R

20081217 Release

2008-12-18 Thread Rich Hickey
I've cut a new release, 20081217, which is available from Google Code: http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_20081217.zip It reflects the many enhancements made since the last release: AOT Compilation gen-class gen-interface clojure.main proxy performance tweaks move to EPL io! blocks ato