Re: 1.8 vs 1.9 performance

2017-12-26 Thread Beau Fabry
We updated 2 apps to 1.9 about a month ago, I believe another team is planning to update next week. No issues. On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 2:45:01 AM UTC-8, John Stevenson wrote: > > Our team has been running in production on Clojure 1.9 release candidates > for the last 4 months. We proces

Re: 1.8 vs 1.9 performance

2017-12-25 Thread John Stevenson
Our team has been running in production on Clojure 1.9 release candidates for the last 4 months. We process about 30 million transactions every day without breaking a sweat, thanks in part to core.async, so performance is excellent for us. As we started with 1.9 I'm unable to give advice about co

RE: 1.8 vs 1.9 performance

2017-12-24 Thread Sean Corfield
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood From: clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of Jiacai Liu Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2017 6:58:01 AM To: Cl

Re: 1.8 vs 1.9 performance

2017-12-24 Thread Erik Assum
I’ve upgraded several apps to 1.9 in production. The transition has been super smooth, although some libs, amongst them core.async, have needed upgrades. I have not seen any performance degradation, but then I haven’t been checking for that. Erik. -- i farta > 24. des. 2017 kl. 15:58 skrev

1.8 vs 1.9 performance

2017-12-24 Thread Jiacai Liu
Clojure 1.9 has been out for a while, are there any companies updating to Clojure 1.9 ? How is the performance compared to 1.8 ? Is the migration smooth? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@go