Your particular example is equivalent to #?(:clj) which is illegal, for the
reason given in the error message you saw.
Normal Clojure comments are far less surprising in their behavior than #_ is
I understand there can be convenience in using #_ when it works.
Andy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Ap
Just noticed that I sent my previous email to clojure-dev only – reposting
to all groups involved:
On 13 April 2015 at 16:25, Michał Marczyk wrote:
> On 13 April 2015 at 15:48, Alex Miller wrote:
> To get the effect you want in this, using #_ *inside* the reader
conditional would work:
>
> #?(:c
Ouch! But that actually makes a lot of sense.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:58 Alex Miller wrote:
> There is a ticket to consider a portable solution to this issue:
>
> http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1293
>
>
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 5:45:35 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
>> The only reas
There is a ticket to consider a portable solution to this issue:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1293
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 5:45:35 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> The only reason :default exists is because *anything* in JavaScript can be
> thrown and there needs to be some way to
Ahh ok, makes sense.
mandag 13. april 2015 12.45.35 UTC+2 skrev David Nolen følgende:
>
> The only reason :default exists is because *anything* in JavaScript can be
> thrown and there needs to be some way to catch non-Error derived values.
> This is not the case for Java of course. :default coul
The only reason :default exists is because *anything* in JavaScript can be
thrown and there needs to be some way to catch non-Error derived values.
This is not the case for Java of course. :default could probably be aliased
to Throwable, but in the meantime differences like this are now handleable
